Is your law firm getting burned by a marketing agency?
If so, you’re not alone.
From solo practitioners to large firms, lawyers often swap horror stories about SEO vendors and lead generation services that overpromise, under-deliver, or downright mislead.
In this data-backed guide, we’ll expose common unethical practices in legal marketing – and arm you with knowledge to protect your firm and your wallet.
Our goal is twofold: inform you about what’s really going on, and encourage you to take action (yes, that may mean booking a call with a trustworthy expert who can help).
Let’s dive into the shady side of legal marketing and how you can outsmart it.
Real-World Examples of Shady Legal Marketing Tactics
Law firm marketing is big business, and unfortunately some agencies cut corners or engage in ethically gray (or pitch-black) tactics.
Here are six real examples that span well-known companies:
1. Lead Sharing & Double-Dipping
Some lead generation services sell the same client inquiry to multiple firms – meaning you’re competing for leads you thought were yours alone.
One legal marketing insider advises “never, ever take non-exclusive leads. Otherwise, you’re competing against 4-5 other attorneys for the exact same leads”, a race to the bottom.
In other words, if an agency isn’t crystal clear that your leads are 100% exclusive, assume they’re being shopped around.
2. SEO Manipulation (Risky Shortcuts)
Even big-name agencies have been caught gaming Google with black-hat SEO.
Exhibit A: FindLaw (a Thomson Reuters company) was penalized by Google in 2008 for selling inbound links to law firm websites – a blatant violation of Google’s guidelines.
They essentially sold “Google juice” by placing dozens of paid keyword-rich links on their network of sites. It worked for a while… until Google cracked down and firm rankings tanked.
The takeaway?
If an agency is building shady link schemes or “secret sauce” networks, they’re putting your website at risk of a Google penalty.
Fast forward to today: a Houston law firm even sued FindLaw, claiming the agency’s botched SEO omitted 84% of their site content and planted hidden links, which destroyed the firm’s traffic.
They alleged FindLaw’s tactics – including paid backlinks that could trigger Google’s spam filters – led to lost clients and layoffs.
3. Non-Exclusive, Recycled Content
Beware the agency that sells “custom content” which isn’t so custom.
Some large vendors have been known to reuse boilerplate legal content across multiple client websites or use outsourced writers with no legal expertise.
In the FindLaw lawsuit above, the firm discovered the promised “expert copywriters” were actually an outsourced team overseas.
Not only is that misrepresentation, it can lead to duplicate content issues and a bland web presence.
Your firm is unique; if your marketing agency gives cookie-cutter blogs or generic text that also appears on other sites, that’s unethical and bad for SEO.
4. Opaque Contracts & “Lock-In” Clauses
Ever get the feeling you’ve signed a roach motel contract (“clients check in, but they don’t check out”)?
Many law firms have.
FindLaw, for example, historically locked firms into 2- or 3-year contracts and made departure painful – you’d have to buy out the remaining term to leave early.
To make matters worse, older FindLaw contracts claimed ownership of your website content they created. If you left, you could lose the very content on your site! (FindLaw later revised this after backlash.)
Likewise, Scorpion, another big legal marketing company, has drawn ire for using a proprietary CMS – if you quit, you can’t simply take your website with you.
In fact, one Reddit user dubbed Scorpion “one of the top scumbag agencies” because it holds clients’ accounts hostage via its proprietary platform, making any transition extremely difficult.
The fine print matters: unethical agencies bank on you not reading the T&C’s.
5. Conflicts of Interest
Did you know some marketing agencies quietly sign up your competitors at the same time?
If an agency is optimizing two PI law firm websites in the same city, at least one of you is getting a raw deal.
Your “partner” is essentially competing against you for the same keywords – while collecting fees from both sides.
As one lawyer warned on a Reddit post, “Avoid the big lawyer marketing companies like Scorpion, Justia, FindLaw. They are all good at marketing themselves; and only themselves.”
If an agency won’t promise market exclusivity (e.g. only one client per practice area per region), ask yourself why. Top ethical agencies often refuse to work for your direct competitors.
6. Lack of Transparency & Fuzzy Reporting
Another common complaint is agencies that play hide-the-ball with results.
They might tout “50 leads this month” without telling you that includes wrong numbers, spam contacts, or people who clearly aren’t cases. (If you’ve ever confronted an agency about lead quality, you know the shrug you get.)
Some agencies also shield their tactics and data – e.g. not sharing Google Ads accounts or analytics access – so you’re in the dark.
For instance, a Scorpion client reported getting lots of irrelevant PPC leads (people asking for free services) and no insight into the ad strategy or targeting.
If an agency can’t or won’t explain what they’re doing with your money, that’s a glaring red flag.
Bottom line: If any of these practices sound familiar, your marketing partner may be doing your firm more harm than good.
Next, let’s look at the high stakes involved – especially in the ultra-competitive personal injury space – and why some agencies resort to unethical moves.
The High Cost of “High-Value” Keywords (2024–2025 Data)
Why do some marketing vendors behave badly? Follow the money.
Certain legal keywords (think “personal injury lawyer [city]”) are among the most expensive and competitive on the planet.
Agencies are under pressure to deliver results in these cutthroat niches – sometimes leading them to cut ethical corners.
Let’s Talk Numbers
High cost of personal injury keywords on Google Ads (selected examples, Dec 2023). Data shows “best mesothelioma lawyer” topping $900 per click, with many city-specific accident queries in the $300–$500+ range.
According to a 2025 legal marketing report, personal injury law is consistently one of the most expensive PPC niches, with average cost-per-click ranging from $70 up to $250 per click in competitive markets.
That means even a single Google Ad click can cost more than a nice dinner for two.
In late 2023, an analysis of Google Ads revealed jaw-dropping prices for top PI terms. For example: “best mesothelioma lawyer” was nearly $936 per click, “Dallas truck accident lawyer” around $426, and “Houston 18-wheeler accident lawyer” about $389 per click.
Many common accident-lawyer phrases easily run $200–$300+ each click (and that’s not even guaranteeing a lead, let alone a signed case!).
Even broader terms cost a fortune. A query like “car accident lawyers Los Angeles” can cost $350+ per click.
Put simply, law firm marketing is an expensive game, especially in personal injury. Agencies and lead generators charge hefty fees largely because Google Ads demand is so high.
If you’re in a major market, a five-figure monthly ad budget is often table stakes – and even then, you might only break even without a savvy strategy.
How Does This Relate To Unethical Practices?
High CPCs and fierce competition create immense pressure to produce ROI.
Unscrupulous agencies might respond by inflating lead numbers (to justify their fees), bidding on broad cheap terms that don’t convert (to show activity), or using black-hat SEO tricks for quick wins.
They figure you might not notice the difference…until you do.
Knowing these numbers also empowers you as a consumer: if an agency promises “100 leads a month for $1,000 spend” in a market where clicks are $200 each, they’re lying through their teeth.
Data doesn’t lie – and understanding the true cost of clicks helps you spot BS from a mile away.
Regulators Are Watching: FTC Warnings and Legal Crackdowns
It’s not just clients getting fed up – regulators have taken notice of deceptive marketing aimed at law firms and legal consumers.
In recent years, there have been notable moves to rein in shady practices:
FTC on Misleading Legal Ads
The Federal Trade Commission has warned lawyers and lead gen companies about deceptive advertising. In one case, the FTC sent letters to several firms and referral services running alarmist TV commercials for lawsuit leads (you’ve probably seen those “This drug might kill you – call now!” ads).
The FTC cautioned that some of these spots misrepresented drug risks and even masqueraded as government health alerts, which is clearly deceptive. The message from the FTC was clear: legal ads must not mislead or prey on fear.
If your marketing agency is producing content that bends the truth (“guaranteed settlement!” or overly sensational claims), they could land you in hot water with regulators – or at least damage your reputation.
“One-to-One” Consent in Lead Gen
For firms buying leads, note that U.S. regulators have been tightening the rules on how leads are generated and sold. The FCC (in charge of telemarketing rules) moved to close the loophole on shared lead consent – essentially banning the old “single checkbox = contact me with offers from everyone” approach.
Under new rules, a consumer’s consent to be contacted must be specific to one law firm or company at a time, not a blanket permission. This one-to-one consent rule (aimed at spammy lead generators) means companies can’t legally blast a person’s info out to a bunch of attorneys with one generic opt-in.
(Industry update: this rule was set to kick in for 2025, though it’s facing some court challenges.)
The spirit of it is important: transparency and honesty in lead generation. If an agency or lead vendor isn’t upfront about how a lead came to you, they might be skirting these guidelines or even breaking the law.
State Bar Ethics and “Shopping” Cases
Beyond federal regulators, state bar associations have ethics rules for lawyer advertising. One infamous unethical trick (thankfully rare) is “claim-jumping” or conflicting out competitors – e.g. a marketing firm funnels a lead to multiple lawyers, then claims a fee or cuts off others.
In New Jersey, an ethics opinion condemned firms that attempted to “conflict out” other attorneys by shopping a client around (not illegal per se, but highly questionable).
The takeaway: any marketing arrangement that feels like it pits lawyers against each other or skirts solicitation rules is a no-go. Your agency should be helping you adhere to ethics rules, not find sneaky ways around them.
FTC and Online Reviews
(A quick note on another area of concern.) The FTC has ramped up enforcement against fake online reviews and endorsements.
If a marketing company is posting fabricated client reviews for your firm, or paying for positive testimonials without disclosure, that’s illegal.
The FTC issued new guidelines in 2023 making it clear that review hijinks can lead to hefty fines. Always insist on real, honest reviews – anything else could burn you later.
In short, deceptive marketing isn’t just a bad look – it can invite lawsuits or regulatory action. The best agencies operate with transparency and integrity because anything less can backfire spectacularly.
If you suspect your vendor is cutting ethical corners, consider it a flashing warning sign to re-evaluate that relationship.
Why Law Firm Visibility Is Tougher (and What Agencies Won’t Tell You)
Even if you avoid shady practices, the online landscape for law firms is challenging.
Search engine result pages (SERPs) for legal queries have changed a lot in recent years, and not necessarily in your favor:
Ads Everywhere (And Above Everything)
Do a Google search for “personal injury lawyer [Your City]” and behold: at the very top, you’ll likely see Google Local Services Ads with “Google Screened” attorneys. These are pay-per-lead ads that outrank all other results – sitting even above the regular pay-per-click text ads.
Below that, you might see traditional PPC ads. Only then come the organic search results, which may start with a map pack (Google Maps listings of law firms) and then the first few website results.
The upshot: On a mobile screen, a user might have to scroll a lot before seeing a non-paid result. Agencies don’t always mention this upfront.
Why?
Some want to sell you SEO alone, but the truth is, in 2025 you often need a combined strategy (SEO and some form of paid presence) to dominate the first page.
Visibility is now a multi-layered battle.
Dominance of Directories & Aggregators
Another SERP behavior you should be aware of: for many lucrative keywords, Google favors large legal directories (Think Avvo, Justia, FindLaw’s directory, Lawyers.com, Yelp, etc.) over individual law firm sites.
For example, a search like “best divorce lawyer in Houston” might yield a top 10 filled with directory listings or media “Top 10” lists, rather than the firms themselves.
These mega-sites have strong domain authority, tons of content, and huge SEO budgets.
A lot of competitor agency blogs tiptoe around this fact, because it’s a tough pill to swallow – but we’re telling you: your website might be technically flawless and full of great content, and it can STILL be outranked by a directory simply due to Google’s preference for large platforms.
An ethical agency will acknowledge this and adjust strategy (e.g. by getting you listed on those directories as well, and focusing on slightly longer-tail keywords, local SEO, etc.), rather than pretending your blog post alone will outrank Avvo.
Google Algorithm Shifts Emphasizing Quality
Google is constantly tweaking its algorithm, and recent updates have zeroed in on weeding out spam and low-quality tactics.
In 2023-2024, Google rolled out core updates and spam updates that punished sites with spammy backlinks or keyword-stuffed pages.
One update even targeted “thin or AI-generated content”, rewarding sites that offer in-depth, human expertise and demoting those trying to game the system with fluff.
For law firms, this means Google expects E-E-A-T: Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness.
Content written by an actual attorney (or at least reviewed by one), demonstrating real legal expertise, is more crucial than ever.
Agencies that were coasting by on trickery – like posting dozens of shallow location-based pages (“City X car accident attorney” with just a boilerplate paragraph) or using private blog networks for links – have seen their tactics collapse in effectiveness.
If your agency hasn’t updated its approach post-2024, you might be investing in strategies that Google now actively filters out.
Local Search and Reviews Matter More
On the bright side, Google’s focus on quality means firms that invest in genuine client reviews and local reputation can gain an edge.
The local map pack is influenced by your Google Business profile, reviews, and proximity. A savvy agency should be helping boost your local SEO (getting Google reviews, ensuring NAP consistency, etc.) rather than only obsessing over generic national keywords.
Why is this in the “what they won’t tell you” section?
Because some agencies find local SEO “unsexy” or hard to bill for, so they might not emphasize it – but it’s often where small and mid-size firms can actually beat out larger competitors in visibility for nearby searches.
Key point: The search landscape for lawyers is no longer just about “10 blue links.”
It’s ads, local packs, Q&A snippets, and more.
If a marketing agency is promising you easy first-page rankings without addressing these realities, they’re omitting half the story.
We believe in telling you the full picture, even if it’s not always what you want to hear – because ultimately it helps you make better decisions.
What Lawyers Really Say About Their Marketing Agencies
It’s telling to hear directly from other attorneys who’ve been through the ringer with marketing providers.
Here are a few candid sentiments from lawyers on platforms like Reddit and legal forums – see if any resonate with you:
“They’re all hat, no cattle.”
One attorney on Reddit cautioned against the flashy big-name vendors, writing: “Avoid the big lawyer marketing companies like Scorpion, Justia, FindLaw. They are all good at marketing… themselves; and only themselves.”
This reflects a common frustration: some agencies excel at selling their service, but when it comes to actually delivering value to the firm, they fall short.
Aggressive Tactics = Red Flags
Industry chatter confirms that agencies with overly aggressive sales tactics often hide service issues. Scorpion, for example, has faced “a number of industry complaints about [its] aggressive tactics.”
High-pressure sales or long contracts might signal that an agency cares more about locking you in than earning your long-term trust.
One Lawyerist review gave Scorpion one of the lowest scores among legal marketers, citing client reviews that failed to get ROI and poor transparency.
“Nothing special under the hood.”
In a discussion about legal SEO, a commenter noted that the “big shops” like some well-known legal SEO firms “do nothing special in comparison to any [decent smaller] shop”.
The implication: you might be paying a premium for a brand name and fancy reports, but the actual work (and results) could be no better than a scrappy boutique agency or an in-house hire would provide.
This is especially true if the big agency is juggling hundreds of clients – you might not get the attention you deserve.
The Hostage Situation
We mentioned it earlier, but it bears repeating because lawyers really hate this: agencies that control your website/domain and then hold it hostage.
“For one, [Vendor X] may hold your account hostage,” wrote one frustrated client, describing how leaving the agency meant potentially losing access to the website they’d paid for.
Always ensure you own your domain name, your content, and your Google My Business listing.
If your agency insists on creating or owning those in their name – run. (Pro tip: If you suspect this, have a candid talk and insist on transferring ownership. Their reaction will speak volumes.)
Lack of Communication
Lawyers on forums often complain that after the contract is signed, the agency goes dark or becomes unresponsive – until renewal time.
If your emails and calls about campaign performance get shrugged off, or you’re passed between account managers frequently, that’s a sign of a churn-and-burn operation.
Look for partners who schedule regular strategy calls and send clear, comprehensible reports (not 50 pages of vanity metrics). You shouldn’t need a PhD in SEO to understand your own marketing results.
By sharing these voices from the field, we want you to know you’re not alone in your skepticism.
The frustration is real, and justified.
The good news: there are ethical, effective marketing partners out there – you just have to know what to look for (and what to avoid).
How This Article Differs From The Rest (What Others Won’t Tell You)
You might be thinking, “I’ve seen other blog posts from marketing agencies about ‘SEO scams’ or ‘questions to ask your marketer.’ How is this different?”
The difference is candor and completeness.
Many marketing agencies publish safe, generic advice – “don’t trust guarantees,” “make sure you get reports,” etc.
Solid tips, sure, but they often fail to mention key realities:
Naming Names
We’ve openly referenced major players and specific incidents (backed by sources) – something most agency blogs avoid for fear of ruffling feathers. We believe law firms deserve the truth, not euphemisms. It’s your money on the line.
Hard Data
Competitors might tell you “PPC for lawyers is pricey” but won’t say how pricey. Here, we provided real 2024 CPC figures (some nearing $1000 per click!) so you can grasp why effective marketing requires investment. We want you to have realistic benchmarks, not vague statements.
SEO Limitations
A lot of marketing content from agencies sells an illusion that just their service will solve all problems. They rarely admit, for example, that no one can guarantee a #1 organic ranking for “personal injury lawyer” in a big city when you’re up against powerhouse directories and ads. We’ve highlighted the challenges of today’s SERPs – because an agency that promises you the moon (“We’ll get you to #1 in a month!”) is either lying or using methods that risk your practice’s reputation.
Regulatory Insight
Scarcely will you find an agency blog mentioning FTC warnings or bar ethics opinions – it’s outside their salesy comfort zone. But we brought those up because your marketing doesn’t exist in a vacuum. There are laws and ethics that should guide how marketing is done for law firms (we think that’s a good thing).
Encouraging Action, Not Complacency
Finally, some competitor posts end with a weak call like “just be careful out there.” That’s nice, but we’re going a step further. We’re encouraging you to take action – whether that’s asking your current agency tough questions, seeking a second opinion on your SEO strategy, or outright switching to a provider who checks all the ethical boxes. You should feel empowered to make changes if needed.
In short, we’re not afraid to give you the unvarnished truth, even if it means admitting that legal marketing is a rough-and-tumble arena.
By doing so, we hope you’ll trust that we have your best interests at heart, not our own short-term gain.
Wrapping Up: Stay Informed and Take Control
The world of legal marketing agencies has its fair share of bad actors and sketchy tactics. But armed with the knowledge you’ve gained here, you can sidestep the traps.
Remember these key points as you move forward in marketing your law firm:
Demand transparency.
Insist on clarity in what services are provided, who is working on your account, where your ads are running, how leads are generated, and what you’re really getting for your money. If an agency balks at sharing data or avoids your questions, that’s your cue to walk.
Short-term contracts or escape clauses are your friend.
Don’t ever feel chained to a vendor that isn’t performing or isn’t ethical. It’s better to pay a bit more for flexibility than to save a buck and sign away your freedom for 24+ months.
Quality over quantity.
10 good leads that turn into 5 cases beat 100 junk leads that turn into zero. Don’t be dazzled by vanity metrics. Hold your marketing partner accountable for meaningful results (calls, consults, signed clients) – not just clicks and impressions.
Trust your gut (and peer feedback).
If you’ve heard consistent bad reviews about a company, where there’s smoke, there’s usually fire. The legal community is surprisingly vocal about these experiences. Use resources like Reddit, Lawyerist, or bar association forums to vet agencies. You’ve seen some candid opinions above – there’s plenty more out there.
Stay educated.
The fact that you’re reading this shows you care about doing marketing right. Keep that up! The landscape changes fast (Google algorithms, ad platforms, consumer behavior). Make sure whoever you work with is continually learning and adjusting – and guiding you through those changes.
Finally, if all of this has you feeling a bit overwhelmed or uneasy about your current marketing efforts, we’re here to help.
Our team prides itself on ethical, transparent, and effective marketing for law firms of all sizes. We’d be happy to audit your current marketing for FREE, discuss your goals, and help chart a better path forward.
No hard sells – just honest guidance (and you’ve seen we don’t sugarcoat things).